U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pape Material Handling, Inc. et al
| U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Pape Material Handling, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv01291 |
| September 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
CONSENT ORDER signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 05/13/2019. The Court herby finds that compliance with all provisions of the foregoing Decree is fair and adequate. The Court hereby retains jurisdiction for the tern of the foregoing Consent Decree, and the provisions thereof are hereby approved. (Gonzales, V)
|
|
Filing
57
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/2/19. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
55
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE THE PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE; AND ORDER. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline to file the Proposed Consent Decree a nd other settlement documents is extended to May 2, 2019. If a further continuance is requested, the Court may set a status conference to assist the parties work through their difficulties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 04/19/2019. (Apodaca, P)
|
|
Filing
53
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE for the Parties to File the Proposed Consent Decree and ORDER,signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/4/19. ( Filing Deadline: 4/19/2019) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
51
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE for the Parties to File the Proposed Consent Degree; and ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/6/19.( Filing Deadline: 4/7/2019) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER LIFTING STAY AND SETTING NEW DEADLINE FOR FILING CONSENT DECREE. The new deadline to file the Proposed Consent Decree is March 7, 2019. Order signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/30/2019. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER re STAY OF CASE. Due to a lapse in appropriations for the EEOC at midnight on December 21, 2018, the litigation of this matter is STAYED until the EEOC's funding is restored and all pending deadlines in this matter will be extended for the same number of days as the EEOC's lapse in funding. Additionally, upon adequate funding, the EEOC will move the Court to lift the stay as soon as possible. Order signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/26/2018. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Granting in Part Joint Motion to Stay the Case until September 6, 2018 and ORDER Setting Telephonic Status Conference (Doc. 32 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/18/2018. The case is stayed until September 6, 2018. Defend ant shall file an opposition, if any, to Plaintiff's Motion to Quash (Docket No. 29 ), on or before September 13, 2018, and Plaintiff may file a reply on or before September 20, 2018. The Court SETS a TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE for September 11, 2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. At the status conference, the Court will take up the issue of whether to continue the stay of this case and the related continuation of the non-expert discovery deadline. (Valdez, E)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Regarding THIRD JOINT Motion to STAY the Case and Continue Defendant's Deadline to File an Opposition to EEOC's Motion to Quash and the EEOC's Reply to Such Motion Pending Settlement Discussions: that this case is STAYED until July 20, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant to file an opposition, if any, to Plaintiff EEOCs Motion to Quash (Doc. No. 29) is CONTINUED to July 27, 2018, and the deadline for Plaintiff to file a reply is CONTINUED to August 3, 2018. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/11/2018. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER on JOINT Motion to Stay the Case (Doc. 25) Until May 4, 2018. The case is stayed until May 4, 2018, and the deadline for Plaintiff to file a motion toquash or for protective order shall be continued to May 4, 2018. Defendant shall file an opposition, if any, on or before May 18, 2018, and Plaintiff may file a reply on or before May 25, 2018. The Court will automatically lift the stay on May 4, 2018. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/18/2018. (Herman, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pape Material Handling, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
| Represented By: | Lorena Garcia |
| Represented By: | Anna Y Park |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pape Material Handling, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
