Ham v. CDCR et al
| Dameon D. Ham |
| CDCR, S. Kernan, Parole Board Hearing and Superior Courts of California |
| 1:2017cv01435 |
| October 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/12/19. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections; ORDER Withdrawing 10 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER Severing Plaintiffs' Claims, and Directing Clerk's Office to Open New Actions for Gregory Richardson and R icky Caldwell; Thirty Day Deadline for All Three Plaintiffs to Each File an Amended Complaint in His Own Case; Forty-Five Day Deadline for Plaintiffs Richardson and Caldwell to Each Submit an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, or Pay the Filing Fees, In His Own Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/29/18. First Amended Complaint Due Within Thirty Days. (Attachments: # 1 Amended Complaint Form)(Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Complaint 1 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/16/18. Referred to Judge Ishii. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
