Huerta v. County of Tulare, et al
Plaintiff: Ramiro Huerta
Defendant: County of Tulare and Tulare County Sheriff
Case Number: 1:2017cv01446
Filed: October 25, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Tulare
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Erica P. Grosjean
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 197 ORDER regarding stipulation and joint request of the parties to modify the schedule and reopen expert discovery for a limited purpose, document 193 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on March 22, 2024. (Rooney, M)
February 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 184 ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE Why His Claims Against Doe Defendants 1-50 Should not be Dismissed Without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on February 28, 2024. Accordingly, based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff has twenty-one days from the date of this order to show cause why his claims against Doe Defendants 1-50 should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute, and/or failure to comply with Rule 4(m). 2. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file an appropriate stipulation for the dismissal of the Doe defendants. (Lopez Amador, Corina)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 181 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on January 26, 2024, granting defendants' ex parte application, document 176 , as follows: 1. Non-expert discovery is reopened for the limited purpose of the trial preservation deposition of Defendant Ronald Smith. 2. The trial preservation deposition of Defendant Smith shall take place no later than March 1, 2022, subject to the following limitations: a. Direct examination by Defendants: No more than 1.5 hours. b. Cross-examination by P laintiff: No more than 1.5 hours. c. Optional re-direct by Defendants: No more than.5 hours. d. Re-cross examination by Plaintiff: No more than.5 hours. 3. During the examination of Defendant Smith by defense counsel, opposing counsel may make object ions in the manner provided for making objections during an oral deposition by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(c)(2) ("An objection must be stated concisely in a nonargumentative and nonsuggestive manner."). (Rooney, M)
December 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 175 AMENDED ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE and ORDER FOLLOWING PRE-SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/16/2023. Telephonic Pre-Settlement Conference is re- set for 3/21/2024 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Settlement Conference is re-set for 4/4/2024 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Kusamura, W)
October 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 169 2nd Amended ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/18/2023. The telephonic Pre-Settlement Conference is CONTINUED to 12/14/2023 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Kusamura, W)
October 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 165 STIPULATION and ORDER of Dismissal without Prejudice of Defendant County of Tulare Pursuant to Fed.R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); ORDER for Clerk of Court to Reflect Change in Caption signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/05/2023. County of Tulare terminated.(Flores, E)
September 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 163 Amended ORDER re Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/15/2023. Telephonic Pre-Settlement Discussion is re-set for 11/7/2023 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Settlement Conference re-set for 11/14/2023 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Kusamura, W)
September 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 161 ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/13/2023. Telephonic Pre-Settlement Conference is set for 9/28/2023 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Settlement Conference set for 10/5/2023 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Kusamura, W)
May 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 147 ORDER regarding stipulation and joint request of the parties for limited extension of the expert discovery deadline and dispositive motion deadline and briefing schedule, document 145 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/23/2023. (Rooney, M)
April 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/25/2023 as follows: Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, document 134 , the Court grants an extension of time to 6/15/2023 as the expert discovery cut-off for the deposition of defendants' rebuttal expert, Ms. Rizzardi, only. (Rooney, M)
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 133 Order re: stipulation and joint request of the parties for modification of the case management schedule deadlines, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/13/2023. (Rebuttal-Supplemental Expert Disclosures Due by 3/24/2023; Expert Discovery due by 5/23/2023; Dispositive Motions filed by 6/2/2023) (Rosales, O.)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on October 24, 2022. Based on the parties' stipulation (ECF No. 128 ), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Dr. Daniel Franc, M.D., shall perform a Rule 35 medical examination of Plaintiff Ramiro Huerta pursuant to the terms and conditions of the parties' stipulation. (Rooney, M)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 127 Order re stipulation and joint request of the parties for modification of the case management scheduling deadlines, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/14/2022. (Expert Disclosure due by 12/5/2022; Rebuttal-Supplemental Expert Disclo sures Due by 1/13/2023; Expert Discovery due by 2/21/2023; Motion for Summary Judgment; Dispositive Motion filed by 3/10/2023. Further, the parties shall file a joint stipulation and proposed order pursuant to the Court's order (ECF No. 124 ) by October 21, 2022. (Rosales, O.)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER FOR MODIFICATION OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE DEADLINES. Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off by 8/1/2022; Expert Disclosures due by 11/4/2022; Telephonic Status Conference set for 12/12/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures due by 12/13/2022; Expert Discovery Cut-Off due by 1/20/2023; Dispositive Motions filed by 2/10/2023. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/10/2022. (Apodaca, P)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 111 Order GRANTING IN PART Defendants' 92 Motion for Contempt and Sanctions; GRANTING Defendants' request for judicial notice; and DENYING Plaintiff's request for sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/12/2022. (Rosales, O.)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 106 Joint Request to Seal signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 03/07/2022. Seven-Day Deadline. (Flores, E)
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/7/2022. The Court orders the Amended Scheduling Order (ECF No. 85 ) modified as follows: Non-Expert Discovery due by 8/1/2022; Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 9/2/2022; Rebuttal Design ation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/4/2022; Expert Discovery due by 11/18/2022; and Dispositive Motions filed by 12/9/2022. No pretrial conference or trial date has been set. All other terms and conditions of the Amended Scheduling Order (ECF No. 85 ) remain in full force and effect.(Rooney, M)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 100 Order re hearing on Defendants' 92 Motion for Sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/18/2022. (Supplemental Briefing filed by 2/28/2022; Stipulation or Status Report filed by 3/4/2022) (Rosales, O.)
August 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 85 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on August 19, 2021. The Court amends the scheduling order as follows: Supplemental Initial Disclosures Deadline: September 22, 2021; Supplemental Discovery Responses Deadline: September 22, 2021; Nonexpert Discovery Cutoff: January 14, 2022; Expert Disclosure Deadline: March 7, 2022; Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline: April 8, 2022; Expert Discovery Cutoff: May 20, 2022; and Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: June 1, 2022. (Rooney, M)
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER Granting Defendants' 53 Motion for Contempt, Denying Plaintiff's 54 Motion to Compel without Prejudice, Granting in Part Plaintiff's Motion to Seal and Strike Document 62 , Staying Case Pending Criminal Case signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 03/25/2019. Fourteen-Day Deadline. (Flores, E)
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER GRANTING the parties' stipulation as follows: 1) The last day to amend the pleadings is extended to April 1, 2019; 2) The non-expert discovery cutoff date is extended to May 2, 2019; and 3) All other dates in the Order Modifying Scheduling Order (ECF No. 43 ) remain the same. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/21/2018. (Rooney, M)
November 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER MODIFYING Scheduling Conference Order (ECF No. 14 ), as follows: 1. Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff is March 21, 2019; 2. Expert Disclosure Deadline is May 2, 2019; 3. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline is May 30, 2019; 4. Expert Discovery Cutoff is July 1, 2019; 5. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline remains set for May 31, 2019; 6. Pretrial Conference remains set for September 30, 2019, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 5 before District Court Judge Dale A. Drozd; 7. Jury Trial remains set for Dec ember 3, 2019, at 1:00 p.m., in Courtroom 5 before District Court Judge Dale A. Drozd; and 8. All other terms and conditions of the Scheduling Conference Order (ECF No. 14 ) remain in full force and effect. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/7/2018. (Rooney, M)
April 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Stipulation GRANTING Plaintiff leave to file Second Amended Complaint; Order,signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/12/2018. (Second Amended Complaint due by 4/18/2018) (Rosales, O)
February 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint within five calendar days of this order, with defendants' response to same due with twenty-one days thereafter. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/2/2018. (Rooney, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Huerta v. County of Tulare, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ramiro Huerta
Represented By: Matthew Davis Owdom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Tulare
Represented By: Amy I. Terrible
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tulare County Sheriff
Represented By: Amy I. Terrible
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?