Cruz v. Savioe
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz |
S. Savioe |
1:2017cv01474 |
November 2, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kern |
Dale A. Drozd |
Barbara A. McAuliffe |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION for Failure to Pay the Required Filing Fee and Failure to Obey a Court Order signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/28/2020. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 35 ORDER DENYING 34 Motion for Reconsideration of Order Revoking In Forma Pauperis Status, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/28/19. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 33 ORDER adopting 26 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and revoking In Forma Pauperis Status signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/25/2019. 21-Day Deadline for Plaintiff to pay $400.00 filing fee in full. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 26 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis status be revoked; Plaintiff be ordered to pay the $400.00 initial filing fee in full to proceed with this action re 11 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint; referred to Judge Drozd, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/24/18. Objections to F&R due 14-Day Deadline(Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 25 ORDER CONSOLIDATING ACTIONS and DESIGNATING 1:17-cv-01474-DAD-BAM(PC) as the LEAD Case and CLOSING 1:18-cv-00990-LJO-EPG(PC) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/15/2018. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 18 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Case Should Not be Consolidated With Trujillo v. Savoie, Case No. 1:18-cv-00990-EPG (PC); ORDER to Show Cause Why In Forma Pauperis Should Not be Revoked, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/6/18. Show Cause Response Due Within Twenty One Days. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING 12 Findings and Recommendations Regarding Dismissal of Certain Claims and Defendants, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/30/18. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 12 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action proceed on Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Savoie; Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief be denied; all other claims be dismissed from this action re 11 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Guillermo Trujillo Cruz ; referred to Judge Drozd,signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 05/24/18. Objections to F&R due by 6/11/2018 (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 9 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 8 Motion for District Court Not to Impose Sanctions or Dismissal of Case signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/6/2017. (Jessen, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cruz v. Savioe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Guillermo Trujillo Cruz | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: S. Savioe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.