Boulas v. United States Postal Service et al
| Matthew Boulas |
| United States Postal Service and Christopher Andrew Bradley |
| 1:2017cv01588 |
| November 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Stanislaus |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 23 U.S.C. ยง 134 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Close Case and Adjust Docket to Reflect Voluntary Dismissal, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 03/22/2018. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER IMPOSING MONETARY SANCTIONS ON JAKRUN'S SHODKI FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS AND DISCHARGING ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 184, and the Courts inherent authority, monetary sanctions of $250.00 are imposed against Jakrun S. Sodhi for his failure to comply with orders of this Court; Jakrun S. Sodhi shall pay the amount of $250.00 to the Clerk of the United States District Co urt, Eastern District of California, no later than March 16, 2018; Jakrun S. Sodhi shall file a proof of payment within five (5) days of payment of the sanction; The February 21, 2018 order to show cause and March 27, 2018 order to show cause are discharged; and Failure to comply with this order may result in the issuance of further sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/9/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING TO MARCH 9, 2018. Accordingly, the show cause hearing set for March 7, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9 is HEREBY CONTINUED to March 9, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiff is ordered to personally appear at thi s date and time at the United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare St., Fresno, California, Courtroom 9. Plaintiff is advised that failure to appear will result in the recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to comply with court orders. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/2/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Personally Appear for Order to Show Hearing signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 02/27/2018. Show Cause Hearing set for 3/7/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within five (5) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why sanction s should not issue for the failure to comply with the Courts order requiring Plaintiff to file a notice informing the Court of the status of service of this action. Plaintiff is forewarned that the failure to show cause may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/21/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Continuing Mandatory Scheduling Conference and Requiring Plaintiff to File Notice of Status of Service signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 02/12/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 4/17/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Joint Scheduling Report due 7-Days Prior to the Scheduling Conference. (Flores, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
