Malcolm Stroud v. Pruitt et al
| Malcolm Tandy Lamon Stroud |
| Ted Pruitt, Jack Smith, Nick Maloy and Prison Industry Authority |
| 1:2017cv01659 |
| December 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER Resetting Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadlines signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/22/2024. Discovery Deadline: June 21, 2024; Dispositive Motion Deadline: August 23, 2024.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER ADOPTING 48 Findings and Recommendations to Deny Defendants' 29 Motion for Summary Judgment re: Exhaustion, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/21/2024. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
48
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny 29 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment RE: Exhaustion re 17 signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/26/2024. Referred to Judge Thurston. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Xiong, J.)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER DENYING Motions for Appointment of Counsel 38 , 46 signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/12/2023. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER GRANTING 39 Defendants' Motion to Modify Discovery and Scheduling Order Deadlines signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/29/2020. Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadlines are VACATED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Granting Defendants' Nunc Pro Tunc 35 Request for Extension of Time to File Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 02/21/2020. Reply Deadline: 02/27/2020.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 30 Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendants' 29 Motion for Summary Judgment, DENYING Plaintiff's Renewed 30 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Order Requiring Defendants to Consider Plaintiff's Settlement Offer, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/8/2020.Opposition due within THIRTY (30) DAYS. (Orozco, A)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Referring Case to Post-Screening ADR and Staying Case for 90 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/9/19. CASE STAYED. Settlement Conference set for 10/8/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Adopting 18 Findings and Recommendations Regarding Dismissal of Certain Claims and Defendants, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/3/19. Nick Maloy (PIA Superintendant II at SATF-Corcoran) and Prison Industry Authority (Contract Worker at Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) terminated. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Randomly Assign District Judge; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Dismissal of Certain Claims and Defendants, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/8/19. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen Days. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint; ORDER DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel Without Prejudice 15 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/22/2018: 30-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel Without Prejudice 8 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/6/2018.(Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
