U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Alcantar, III
| U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Salvador Alcantar, III |
| 1:2017mc00032 |
| May 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Erica P. Grosjean |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER Directing Clerk to Close Case and Vacating Hearings re 5 Motion to Dismiss signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/20/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES as follows: IT IS ORDERED THAT (1) Respondent appear on July 28, 2017, at 9:15 a.m. in Courtroom 10, Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse located at 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA before U.S. Magistrate Judge Erica P. Gr osjean (currently noticed for hearing on June 23, 2017), and show cause why Respondent should not be compelled to comply with the Subpoena No. Fresno 017-04 issued by EEOC; (2) Petitioner serve Respondent with a copy of the Order to Show Cause with the Application, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and the supporting documents, including this Order, on which this Order is based on or before July 3, 2017; (3) Petitioner is allowed to serve Respondent by publication pursuant to California Cod e of Civil Procedure 415.50. Petitioner will publish the summons in the Fresno Bee or a newspaper, published in the State of California, which is most likely to give actual notice to Respondent of service. Petitioner shall forthwith mail Respondent t his Order and the supporting documents detailed in (1) above, if his address is ascertained before the expiration of the time prescribed for publication. Petitioner will comply with California Government Code 6064 and effectuate notice by publication once a week for four successive weeks with at least five days intervening between respective publication dates, not counting such publication dates, ending on a date no later than July 10, 2017; and (4) Respondent must file and serve its answer or response to the EEOC's Application for an Order to Show Cause no later than July 17, 2017. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/12/2017. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING Why Subpoena Should Not Issue set for 6/23/2017 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/17/2017. (Rooney, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Alcantar, III | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
| Represented By: | Nakkisa Akhavan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Salvador Alcantar, III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
