Cervantes v. ASJS Investments, LLC et al
| Aurora Cervantes |
| ASJS Investments, LLC, Narinderpal Singh and Nishan Singh |
| 1:2018cv00001 |
| December 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Merced |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Close Case signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/29/2018. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND IMPOSING MONETARY SANCTIONS. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The June 13, 2018 order to show cause is discharged; Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 184, and the Courts inher ent authority, monetary sanctions of $100.00 are imposed against Daniel Malakauskas for his failure to comply with orders of this Court; Daniel Malakauskas shall pay the amount of $100.00 to the Clerk of the United States District Court, Ea stern District of California, no later than June 20, 2018; Daniel Malakauskas shall file a proof of payment within five (5) days of payment of the sanction; and Failure to comply with this order may result in the issuance of further sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/14/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MONETARY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH APRIL 5, 2018 ORDER. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: PLAINTIFF SHALL SHOW CAUSE within five (5) days of the date of entry of this o rder why monetary sanctions should not issue for the failure to comply with the April 5, 2018 order; Within twenty-four hours of the date of entry of this order, Mr. Malakauskas shall file an acknowledgement of this order and an attestation that he has calendared the deadline to respond to this order to show cause; and Plaintiff is forewarned that the failure to show cause will result in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/13/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER imposing monetary sanction on Catherine M. Corfee for failure to comply with court orders signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/9/2018. Filing Deadline: 5/16/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING TO MAY 9, 2018. Based on the foregoing, the hearing set for April 17, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. is HEREBY CONTINUED to May 9, 2018, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9. Catherine M. Corfee shall personally appear at that time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/17/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING FROM 4/12/2018 to 4/17/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/9/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER REQUIRING CATHERINE M. CORFEE TO PERSONALLY APPEAR ON APRIL 12, 2018 AT 10:00 A.M. IN COURTROOM 9. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/6/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER requiring Plaintiff to file dispositional documents within sixty (60) days 12 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/5/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER REQUIRING CATHERINE M. CORFEE TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR - THREE DAY DEADLINE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/2/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
