Gonzalez v. On Habeas Corpus
| Luis Miguel Gonzalez |
| On Habeas Corpus |
| 1:2018cv00039 |
| January 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Michael J. Seng |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER GRANTING 59 Motion to Stay; ORDER WITHDRAWING 55 Findings and Recommendations signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 03/07/2022. Status Report due within Sixty-Days. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
55
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny Petitioner Relief on His Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 09/02/2021. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen-Days. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER APPROVING Petitioner's Application for Subpeona Duces Tecum, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 12/3/2019. (Orozco, A)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Setting New Discovery Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 11/1/2019. Discovery due by 12/2/2019. Discovery Status Report Deadline: 11/18/2019. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Setting Status Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/29/19. Telephonic Status Conference set for 11/1/2019 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson.(Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER GRANTING Petitioner's Motion for Discovery; ORDER APPOINTING Counsel for Limited Purpose of Discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 8/2/19. (This order served on David Porter via email.) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 8 , 19 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/2/2019: The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the caption to identify Michael Sexton, rather than "On Habeas Corpus," as the respondent in this action; and The matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER VACATING 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS that Respondent's 8 Motion to Dismiss be Denied signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 1/4/2019. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. Objections to F&R due within Fourteen (14) Days. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
13
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 8 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition as Time-Barred be GRANTED re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/11/2018. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gonzalez v. On Habeas Corpus | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Luis Miguel Gonzalez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: On Habeas Corpus | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
