Rhoden v. Department of State Hospitals et al
| Lawtis Donald Rhoden |
| Department of State Hospitals, Pam Ahlin and Brandon Price |
| 1:2018cv00101 |
| January 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER ADOPTING 70 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/18/2020. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER denying Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, without prejudice, to re-filing with proper Rand Notice 63 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/8/2019. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER GRANTING 61 Defendants' Motion to Extend the Time to File a Dispositive Motion signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/26/2019. Dispositive Motions filed by 10/7/2019. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Second 59 Motion to Supplement the Complaint with Legal Authority, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/30/19. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 57 Motion to Supplement the Complaint with Legal Authority, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/23/19. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER ADOPTING 51 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on March 7, 2019, is denied, without prejudice, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 03/25/2019. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER extending the Amended Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendant, Stephen Eggen signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/13/2019. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
51
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION recommending Plaintiff's MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 50 be denied, without prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/11/2019. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R's due within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
49
AMENDED Discovery and Scheduling ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/4/19. New Discovery Deadline: June 27, 2019; New Dispositive Motion Deadline: August 27, 2019. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 40 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/23/2019. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER adopting 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS dismissing access to the courts and medical claims and referring matter back to the Magistrate Judge for initiation of service of process signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/15/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
30
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending dismissal of certian claims for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief re 29 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/30/2018. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due within 21-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER Adopting 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; DENYING Plaintiff's Motions for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/8/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER GRANTING 8 , 11 , 15 , 19 Motions to Amend and DIRECTING Clerk of the Court to File Third Amended Complaint Lodged on February 8, 2018, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 02/13/18. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
