Tapia v. Romance, et al.
| Joline Tapia |
| Joseph S. Romance, R&M Kent Management, Inc, Margaret Kent, Justin Kent, R&M Kent Family LTD Partnership, Alliance Title Company, Inc. and Kent Management, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv00179 |
| February 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Jennifer L. Thurston |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 241 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
DECISION and ORDER Discharging Order to Show Cause 23 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/30/2018: The case is and shall remain closed. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
23
DECISION and ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss and ORDERING Mr. Gonzalez to Show Cause why he should not be subject to Rule 11 Sanctions signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/1/2018. (Show Cause Response due by 3:00 p.m. Friday, 8/24/2018). (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER GRANTING 9 Extension of Time to Serve the Summons and Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/2/2018. Summons and complaint to be served by 6/4/2018. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING 7 Plaintiff's Request to Continue Initial Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/19/2018. Initial Scheduling Conference CONTINUED to 6/22/2018 at 08:45 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
