Rickman v. Varquez

Plaintiff: Dannie Rickman
Defendant: Varquez
Case Number: 1:2018cv00204
Filed: February 9, 2018
Court: California Eastern District Court
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Sheila K. Oberto
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 9, 2018 18 Opinion or Order of the Court FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action, based on Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and comply with the local rules by keeping his address of record updated; Clerk of Court directed to assign a District Judge; new case number is 1:18-cv-00204 DAD-SKO (PC) re 7 Complaint filed by Dannie Rickman ; referred to Judge Drozd,signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 05/08/2018. Objections to F&R due by 6/4/2018 (Martin-Gill, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rickman v. Varquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dannie Rickman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Varquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?