Rodriguez ,et al. v. M. J. Brothers, Inc., et al.
| Victor Rodriguez, Estreberto Valdez, Miguel Esparza and Francisco Banda |
| M.J. Brothers, Inc., Eduardo Martin, Daniel Martin, Fernando Martin and Ronald Martin |
| 1:2018cv00252 |
| February 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER granting Motion for final approval of class action settlement, award of enhancement payments to named Plaintiffs, and award of attorney fees and costs and retaining jurisdiction to enforce settlement agreement 32 , 34 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/21/2019. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/24/2019. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER VACATING April 24, 2019 Hearing, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 04/19/2019. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER assigning action to U.S. Magistrate Judge for all purposes pursuant to the consent of all parties signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/14/2019. New Case Number is 1:18-cv-00252-SAB. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CONCERNING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; VACATING MARCH 8, 2019 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; AND CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLAS S ACTION SETTLEMENT TO APRIL 24, 2019. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The findings and recommendations filed March 8, 2019 is VACATED; The hearing on Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement is CONTINUED to April 24, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9. Plaintiffs shall file supplemental briefing addressing the concerns raised in the findings and recommendations by April 17, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/14/2019. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
24
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Objections due within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/8/2019. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Re Stipulation to File First Amended Complaint,signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/5/19. (Case Management Deadline: 7-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER RE NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT. All pending motions, deadlines, and dates in this action are VACATED and the parties shall file a motion for preliminary approval of class settlement on or before February 4, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/4/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
15
SCHEDULING ORDER RE CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION DEADLINE: Motion filing deadline 12/21/2018, Opposition deadline 1/25/2019, Reply deadline 2/8/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/1/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER RE STIPULATION CONCERNING DISCOVERY, STAY OF THE ACTION, AND MEDIATION. ORDER CONTINUING Scheduling Conference from May 15, 2018 to 10/11/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/9/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
