Sequoia ForestKeeper et al v. Carlson et al
| Sequoia ForestKeeper and Earth Island Institute |
| Ann Carlson and U.S. Forest Service |
| 1:2018cv00331 |
| March 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER re 32 Stipulation of Dismissal and Directing Clerk of Court to Close Case signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/21/2019. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR STAYING BRIEFING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL IN RELATED CASE signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on July 25, 2018. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER GRANTING 20 Motion to Intervene signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/16/2018. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DISPENSING WITH STATEMENTS OF UNDISPUTED FACTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/19/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER Granting 19 Pro Hac Vice Application, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/15/18. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER to reassign case to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/23/2017. The new case number is 1:18-cv-00331-LJO-SAB. (Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
