Charles W. Cooley v. Indian River Transport Co.
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 8, 2018
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 06/07/18 GRANTING plaintiff Charles Cooley LEAVE TO AMEND to file his First Amended Complaint; defendant's responsive pleading is due 30 days after the First Amended Complaint is filed. The Amended Complaint (attached to 53 Proposed Stipulation and Order) is DEEMED filed as of the date of this Order. (Benson, A.)
|April 27, 2018
STIPULATION and ORDER 51 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/27/2018 continuing the Scheduling Conference to 7/30/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. A joint status report shall be filed no later than 7/16/2018, and the parties shall adhere to the court's orders as outlined in the 49 Order Re Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference issued 4/20/2018. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|April 20, 2018
ORDER RELATING CASES signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/20/18, ORDERING that the actions denominated Shook v. Indian River Transport Co., No. 1:14-CV-1415 WBS BAM, and Cooley v. Indian River Transport Co., No. 1:18-CV-491 DAD SAB are deemed related. The case denominated Cooley v. Indian River Transport Co., No. 1:18-CV-491 DAD SAB, is REASSIGNED to the Honorable William B. Shubb. Any dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. The captions on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as Cooley v. Indian River Transport Co., No. 1:18-CV-491 WBS BAM. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?