Charles W. Cooley v. Indian River Transport Co.

Plaintiff: Charles W. Cooley
Respondent: Indian River Transport Co.
Case Number: 1:2018cv00491
Filed: April 11, 2018
Court: California Eastern District Court
Office: Fresno Office
County: Stanislaus
Referring Judge: Barbara A. McAuliffe
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 31, 2018 59 Opinion or Order of the Court STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/31/2018 ORDERING The parties shall engage in private mediation within the next 60 days. All deadlines shall be postponed until after mediation is completed. If the partie s are unable to settle the case, they will return for a further Status Conference on 10/9/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Discovery and motion deadlines will be set date at that point, if necessary. (Washington, S)
June 8, 2018 54 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 06/07/18 GRANTING plaintiff Charles Cooley LEAVE TO AMEND to file his First Amended Complaint; defendant's responsive pleading is due 30 days after the First Amended Complaint is filed. The Amended Complaint (attached to 53 Proposed Stipulation and Order) is DEEMED filed as of the date of this Order. (Benson, A.)
April 27, 2018 52 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION and ORDER 51 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/27/2018 continuing the Scheduling Conference to 7/30/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. A joint status report shall be filed no later than 7/16/2018, and the parties shall adhere to the court's orders as outlined in the 49 Order Re Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference issued 4/20/2018. (Kirksey Smith, K)
April 20, 2018 47 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER RELATING CASES signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/20/18, ORDERING that the actions denominated Shook v. Indian River Transport Co., No. 1:14-CV-1415 WBS BAM, and Cooley v. Indian River Transport Co., No. 1:18-CV-491 DAD SAB are deemed related. The case denominated Cooley v. Indian River Transport Co., No. 1:18-CV-491 DAD SAB, is REASSIGNED to the Honorable William B. Shubb. Any dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. The captions on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as Cooley v. Indian River Transport Co., No. 1:18-CV-491 WBS BAM. (Kastilahn, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charles W. Cooley v. Indian River Transport Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles W. Cooley
Represented By: Maria Adrianne De Castro
Represented By: Aashish Y. Desai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Indian River Transport Co.
Represented By: Alexandra Hemenway
Represented By: Richard H Rahm
Represented By: Britney Noelle Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?