Gonzalez v. Selma Police Department et al
| Clemente Gonzalez |
| Selma Police Department, Greg Garner, Joshua Johnson and Gilbert Cantu |
| 1:2018cv00602 |
| May 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissing 1 Action for Failure to Pay Filing Fee; Objections Due within Twenty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/19/2018. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. Objections to F&R due within Twenty (20) Days. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Adopting 7 Findings and Recommendations and Denying Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 2 , 4 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/13/18. Filing Fee Due Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
7
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending denying Plaintiff's MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 2 , 4 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/31/2018. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd; Objections to F&R due by 7/5/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Submit Supplemental Briefing on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Within Ten (10) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/17/2018. (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
