Solomon v. Torres et al
| Maxine Solomon |
| S. Torres, M. Quandt and D. Glanzer |
| 1:2018cv00615 |
| May 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Madera |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING 15 Findings and Recommendations and ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Due to Plaintiff's Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/24/2020. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regading Dismissal of Action for Failure to State a Claim signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/26/2019. Referred to Judge Drozd; Objections to F&R due by 12/16/2019. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 13 Motion to Add Defendant, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/19/2019. (Orozco, A)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DENYING 7 Motion to Proceed IFP as MOOT signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/15/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee within 45 Days signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 05/08/2018. Motion for IFP due by 6/25/2018. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application Form)(Flores, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
