Heinrich, et al. v. DiTech Financial LLC, et al.
| John Charles Heinrich and Bobbie Ann Heinrich |
| Ditech Financial LLC and NBS Default Services, LLC |
| 1:2018cv00664 |
| May 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER DISMISSING Action for Plaintiffs' Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Obey Court Orders, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/3/19. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER to Plaintiff's to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not be Imposed for Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Obey a Court Order, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/4/19. Show Cause Response Due Within Fourteen Days. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING MRO Investment, Inc.'s 19 Motion to Dismiss and GRANTING Plaintiffs' Counsel's 22 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/28/19. Attorney Lenden Franklin Webb terminated. Thirty Day Deadline to Amended Complaint. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, Denying Defendants' 5 Motion to Dismiss as Moot, and Denying without Prejudice Plaintiffs' Counsel's 9 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/13/2018. (Flores, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
