Estate of Alejandro Sanchez et al v. County of Stanislaus et al
| Cristina Girardi, Estate of Alejandro Sanchez, Marina Sanchez, Irene Mamourieh and Bertha Sanchez |
| Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department, Adam Christianson and County of Stanislaus |
| 1:2018cv00977 |
| July 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Stanislaus |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Barbara A McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
REQUEST for Filing of Oversized Opposition Brief to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by Estate of Alejandro Sanchez, Cristina Girardi, Irene Mamourieh, Bertha Sanchez, Marina Sanchez. (Merin, Mark)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to DISMISS by Adam Christianson, County of Stanislaus, Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department. Motion Hearing set for 11/20/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of John R. Whitefleet)(Whitefleet, John)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER (TEXT Only): Due to the press of business, the Scheduling Conference is continued from 10/24/2018 to Wednesday, December 5, 2018 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. A JOINT Scheduling Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in full compliance with the requirements set forth in the Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference (Doc. #3 ), one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference, and a copy shall be e-mailed, in Word format, to bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Parties wishing to appear telephonically may do so with each party using the following dial-in number and passcode: dial-in number 1-877-411-9748; passcode 3190866. Minute order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/29/2018. (Valdez, E)
|
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by Adam Christianson, County of Stanislaus, Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department. Attorney Whitefleet, John Robert added. (Whitefleet, John)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Adam Christianson served on 7/25/2018, answer due 8/15/2018. (Merin, Mark)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department served on 7/25/2018, answer due 8/15/2018. (Merin, Mark)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: County of Stanislaus served on 7/24/2018, answer due 8/14/2018. (Merin, Mark)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/24/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Adam Christianson, County of Stanislaus, Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Mark E. Merin* *1010 F Street* *Suite 300* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Adam Christianson, County of Stanislaus, Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department by Bertha Sanchez, Estate of Alejandro Sanchez, Irene Mamourieh, Marina Sanchez, Cristina Girardi. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7773056) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Bertha Sanchez re Cal. Code Civ. Proc. 377.32, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Merin, Mark)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
