(PC) David Florence v. Kernan et al
| David Florence |
| B. McKinney, Kenneth J. Pogue, B. Kibler, R.M. Diaz, S. Kernan, B. Cates and K. Allison |
| 1:2018cv01045 |
| August 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Anthony W Ishii |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff's #10 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief be Denied without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 09/11/2018. Referred to Judge Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 10/9/2018. (Flores, E) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #14 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), served on David Florence. (Flores, E) |
Filing 13
FIRST SCREENING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 09/11/2018. Amended Complaint due by 10/5/2018. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint Form)(Flores, E)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #13 Screening Order served on David Florence. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to District Judge Anthony W. Ishii and Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. The new case number is: 1:18-cv-1045 AWI-JLT (PC). (Martin-Gill, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 12 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, served on David Florence. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against K. Allison, B. Cates, R.M. Diaz, S. Kernan, B. Kibler, B. McKinney, Kenneth J. Pogue by David Florence.(Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by David Florence. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 9 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by David Florence. (Martin-Gill, S) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/10/18. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on David Florence. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 7 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by David Florence (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: New Case Documents on NKSP. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 5 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Service Notice issued re complaint filed *8/3/2018*; Consent or Decline due by 9/10/2018 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Service Notice) (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for David Florence, CDC H-42260 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsFresno@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by David Florence. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 2 LETTER from David Florence (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against K. Allison, B. Cates, R.M. Diaz, S. Kernan, B. Kibler, B. McKinney, Kenneth J. Pogue by David Florence.(Martin-Gill, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
