Paul Reiffer v. HGM Holdings LLC
Paul Reiffer |
HGM Holdings LLC and HGM Holdings LLC Doing business as HGM Business Group |
1:2018cv01058 |
August 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Barbara A McAuliffe |
Lawrence J O'Neill |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 COPYRIGHT NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED as to Copyright #1:* VA 2-044-620 * * Group Registration Photos, Landscape and Commercial * * Paul Reiffer * ; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/15/2018 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 Copyright Report, #4 VDRP) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *HGM Holdings LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jonah Adam Grossbardt* *Schneider Rothman Intellectual Property Group, PLLC* *1801 Century Park East, Suite 1100* *Los Angeles, CA 90067*. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement - Injunctive Relief Demanded against HGM Holdings LLC by Paul Reiffer. Attorney Grossbardt, Jonah Adam added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7800243) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2 - Infringement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Grossbardt, Jonah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.