(HC) Underwood v. Matevousian
Daniel Ray Underwood |
Andre Matevousian |
1:2018cv01104 |
August 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Merced |
Dale A Drozd |
Sheila K Oberto |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The new case number is: 1:18-cv-01104-DAD-SKO. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 8 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Daniel Ray Underwood. (McClintock, Ann) |
Filing 7 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on United States Attorney. (Flores, E) |
Filing 6 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 08/28/2018. Respondent's Consent or Decline due by 11/1/2018. (Flores, E) |
Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 08/24/2018. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (Flores, E) |
Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/1/2018. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Flores, E) |
Filing 3 PETITION against Andre Matevousian by Daniel Ray Underwood.(McClintock, Ann) |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE of DOCKET CORRECTION to Ann McClintock re #1 Complaint: Your filing is entitled Complaint, however, the actual document attached is a Petition. Please re-file your document using the correct event. If you need assistance, please contact the CM/ECF help desk at 866-884-5444, or refer to the CM/ECF User's Manual on the court's website. Under Local Rule 3-200, every complaint, amended complaint, or other document initiating a civil action shall be accompanied by a completed civil cover sheet, on a form available from the Clerk and on the Court's website. Please file your civil cover sheet. If you need assistance, please contact the CM/ECF help desk at 866-884-5444, or refer to the CM/ECF User's Manual on the court's website. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Section 2241 Petition against Andre Matevousian by Daniel Ray Underwood.(McClintock, Ann) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (HC) Underwood v. Matevousian | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Daniel Ray Underwood | |
Represented By: | Ann Catherine McClintock |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Andre Matevousian | |
Represented By: | Litigation Coordinator |
Represented By: | Bureau of Prisons Regional Counsel |
Represented By: | US Attorney's Office- 2241 Unit |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.