Wilburn v. Diann
| Deborah Ann Wilburn |
| Rose Marie Diann |
| 1:2018cv01153 |
| August 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending as follows: 1) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), this action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted; and 2) The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the district judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/25/2018. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER VACATING #4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS;ORDER GRANTING #5 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/24/18. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Findings and Recommendations (Order), Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Deborah Ann Wilburn. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Findings and Recommendations served on Deborah Ann Wilburn. (Rooney, M) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Deborah Ann Wilburn. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 4 Findings and Recommendation recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/5/2018. Matter referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due by 10/22/2018. (Rosales, O) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Findings and Recommendations (Motion) served on Deborah Ann Wilburn. (Rosales, O) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and Directing Plaintiff to Either Pay the Filing Fee or File an Amended In Forma Pauperis Application Within Fourteen (14) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/29/2018. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application). (Jessen, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Deborah Ann Wilburn. (Jessen, A) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Deborah Ann Wilburn. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rose Marie Diann by Deborah Ann Wilburn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilburn v. Diann | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rose Marie Diann | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Deborah Ann Wilburn | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
