(PC) Richardson v. Tuman et al
| Paul Richardson |
| R. Tuman, C. Saenz, J. Cota and G. Kidd |
| 1:2018cv01166 |
| August 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to 3745 S. Grand Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90007 by Paul Richardson. (No changes made.) (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 13 MOTION Rescinding Motion to Incorporate Statement of Case, to This Court, and Request to Proceed With Current Complaint Without Reference to the Additional Documents Filed on August 31, 2018 as Reference by This Court, by Paul Richardson. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS by Paul Richardson. Address Remains the Same. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Paul Richardson. (Flores, E) |
| RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, served on Paul Richardson. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to 3745 S. Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90007 by Paul Richardson. (Flores, E) |
| RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief served on Paul Richardson. (Flores, E) |
Filing 9
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's #8 Motion to Incorporate Statement of the Case and Exhibits with Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 09/06/2018. Amended Complaint due by 10/9/2018.(Flores, E)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief served on Paul Richardson. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Incorporate this Statement of the Case with E-Filed Civil Compliant by Paul Richardson. (Flores, E) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Granting #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 08/28/2018. (Attachments: #1 Application for IFP) (Flores, E)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Paul Richardson. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 6 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Paul Richardson. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 5 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Paul Richardson, CDC J-46614 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsFresno@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 4 DOCUMENTS SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Avenal State Prison. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: E-Service Notice issued re complaint filed *8/28/2018*; Plaintiff's Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Service Notice) (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Paul Richardson. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against J. Cota, G. Kidd, C. Saenz, R. Tuman by Paul Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
