(HC) Hairston v. Zulfa et al
Petitioner: Robey Kurt Hairston
Respondent: David R. Zulfa, Brandon Stalling and Tabitha Adams
Case Number: 1:2018cv01194
Filed: August 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
Presiding Judge: Stanley A Boone
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why the Petition Should Not Be Dismissed Without Prejudice for Failure to Exhaust State Court Remedies signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/6/2018. Show Cause Response due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
September 6, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order to Show Cause served on Robey Kurt Hairston. (Jessen, A)
September 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Robey Kurt Hairston signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/5/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
September 5, 2018 Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/9/2018 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Plummer, M)
September 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:18-cv-2341 EFB) to Fresno (1:18-cv-1194 SAB) signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 09/05/18. (Plummer, M)
September 5, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Order served on Robey Kurt Hairston. (Plummer, M)
September 5, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order Authorizing IFP Status served on Robey Kurt Hairston. (Lundstrom, T)
August 31, 2018 RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider re-served on Robey Kurt Hairston at corrected address NKSP. (Yin, K)
August 28, 2018 Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/1/2018 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Reader, L)
August 28, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Robey Kurt Hairston. (Reader, L)
August 27, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Tabitha Adams, Brandon Stalling, David R. Zulfa by Robey Kurt Hairston.(Reader, L)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Hairston v. Zulfa et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robey Kurt Hairston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David R. Zulfa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brandon Stalling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tabitha Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?