(HC) Avila v. Sullivan
Petitioner: Michael Avila
Respondent: Sullivan
Case Number: 1:2018cv01243
Filed: September 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale A Drozd
Referring Judge: Jennifer L Thurston
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2018 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. The new case number is: 1:18-cv-1243 DAD-JLT (HC). (Martin-Gill, S)
November 2, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: 10 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, served on Michael Avila. (Martin-Gill, S)
October 26, 2018 Filing 9 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Sullivan: Amended #7 Notice of Appearance, #8 Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Cary, Amanda)
October 26, 2018 Filing 8 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Sullivan. (Cary, Amanda)
October 26, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Amanda Diane Cary on behalf of Sullivan. Attorney Cary, Amanda Diane added. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Cary, Amanda)
September 18, 2018 Filing 6 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on Tami Krenzin, Attorney General's Office. (Gonzalez, R)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT Respondent's Consent or Decline Due Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/18/18. (Gonzalez, R)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Requiring Respondent to File a Response to Petition; ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule: ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Serve Documents on Attorney General, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/17/18. (Gonzalez, R)
September 18, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition served on Michael Avila. (Gonzalez, R)
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Michael Avila, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/13/18. (Gonzalez, R)
September 13, 2018 Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Petitioner's Consent or Decline Due Within Thirty Days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Gonzalez, R)
September 13, 2018 Filing 1 (2254) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sullivan by Michael Avila. (Gonzalez, R)
September 13, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Order Authorizing IFP Status, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on Michael Avila. (Gonzalez, R)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Avila v. Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Avila
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sullivan
Represented By: Amanda Diane Cary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?