Cook v. County of Fresno et al
Thomas P. Cook |
Rick Barclay, County of Fresno and Jeffrey D. Hammel |
1:2018cv01347 |
October 1, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Erica P Grosjean |
Lawrence J O'Neill |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Findings and Recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed as barred by the Younger Abstention Doctrine and for failure to state a claim, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/19/2018. Matter referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due by 12/10/2018. (Rosales, O) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), served on Thomas P. Cook. (Rosales, O) |
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING Motion to Proceed IFP #2 ; ORDER Directing Payment of Inmate Filing Fee by the Fresno County Sheriff, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/24/2018. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (Hellings, J) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Thomas P. Cook. (Hellings, J) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Thomas P. Cook. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rick Barclay, County of Fresno, Jeffrey D. Hammel by Thomas P. Cook.(Gonzalez, R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.