Cortes v. Kern County Superintendent
| Gustavo Cortes |
| Kern County Superintendent of Schools-Valley Oaks Charter School Tehachapi |
| 1:2018cv01355 |
| October 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Lawrence J O'Neill |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Gustavo Cortes served on 10/16/2018, answer due 11/6/2018. (Marcus, Andrea) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE of DOCKET CORRECTION. Document #9 , Ex Parte Application was filed in error. Please disregard. (Robles, S) |
| Filing 9 ***DISREGARD*** EX PARTE APPLICATION by Gustavo Cortes for Filing Administrative Record under Seal. (Marcus, Andrea) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER by Kern County Superintendent of Schools-Valley Oaks Charter School Tehachapi. Attorney Gutcher, Stephanie Virrey added.(Gutcher, Stephanie) |
| Filing 7 USM 285 Civil Form. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/3/2019 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Kern County Superintendent of Schools-Valley Oaks Charter School Tehachapi* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Andrea Moore Marcus* *Law Offices of Andrea Marcus* *133 East De La Guerra Street, #143* *Santa Barbara, CA 93101-2247*. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING the Clerk to Issue New Case Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/3/18. (Marrujo, C)
|
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Gustavo Cortes (Marcus, Andrea) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Gustavo Cortes. Motion Hearing set for 10/5/2018 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Marcus, Andrea) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Attorney's fees as Prevailing Party against Kern County Superintendent of Schools-Valley Oaks Charter School Tehachapi by Gustavo Cortes. Attorney Marcus, Andrea Moore added. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Complaint)(Marcus, Andrea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cortes v. Kern County Superintendent | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kern County Superintendent of Schools-Valley Oaks Charter School Tehachapi | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Virrey Gutcher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gustavo Cortes | |
| Represented By: | Andrea Moore Marcus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
