(PC) Washington v. Davey et al
| Jesse Washington |
| M. Robicheaux and Dave Davey |
| 1:2018cv01449 |
| October 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Jesse Washington. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 5 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Jesse Washington (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/22/2018. (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion) (Sant Agata, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Jesse Washington. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 11/23/2018. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jesse Washington. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Jesse Washington.(Sant Agata, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint served on Jesse Washington. (Sant Agata, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
