Philbrick v. Best Time RV, L.P. et al
| Terry Philbrick |
| Best Time RV, L.P. and Jonas Deutsch |
| 1:2018cv01562 |
| November 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Anthony W Ishii |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 23 U.S.C. ยง 134 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Best Time RV, L.P.. Attorney Libke, Ryan D. added.(Libke, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Best Time RV, L.P. served on 12/17/2018, answer due 1/7/2019. (Clark, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Terry Philbrick. (Clark, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/4/2019 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Gonzalez, R) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Best Time RV, L.P., Jonas Deutsch* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Matthew C. Clark* *Chain | Cohn | Stiles* *1731 Chester Avenue, PO Box 2348* *Bakersfield, CA 93301*. (Gonzalez, R) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES against All Defendants by TERRY PHILBRICK. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7964827) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Clark, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
