(PC) Rodriguez v. Agostini et al
| Pedro Rodriguez |
| Dr. Gill, H. Longia, A. Rowe, C. Amador, Fisher C. Agostini and S. Hurst |
| 1:2018cv01565 |
| November 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Pedro Rodriguez. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/20/18. (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Pedro Rodriguez. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 4
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on VSP. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Service Notice issued re complaint filed *11/14/2018*; Consent or Decline due by 12/20/2018. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Service Notice) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Pedro Rodriguez. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 1
(1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Pedro Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marrujo, C)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
