(HC) Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
Frederick Banks |
Central Intelligence Agency, U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives, Gina Haspel, Devin Nunes, Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, Alexandria Acossa Cortez and Ventura County Sheriff's Office |
1:2018cv01655 |
December 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Lawrence J O'Neill |
Jeremy D Peterson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28:2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT by Frederick Banks. (Jessen, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, Findings and Recommendations (Order), #6 Judgment served on Frederick Banks. (Flores, E) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT dated *01/03/2019* pursuant to order. (Flores, E) |
![]() |
Filing 4 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Frederick Banks. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 3 OBJECTIONS to FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS #2 by Petitioner Frederick Banks. (Marrujo, C) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Findings and Recommendations, served on Frederick Banks. (Gonzalez, R) |
![]() |
Filing 1 (2241) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Central Intelligence Agency, Alexandria Acossa Cortez, Gina Haspel, Devin Nunes, Adam Schiff, U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Senate, Ventura County Sheriff's Office, Maxine Waters by Frederick Banks.(Gonzalez, R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.