(PC) Anderson v. Diaz et al
Lewis Anderson |
Ralph Diaz, A. Klang, John Katavich, Sergeant G. Munoz, R. Lara, R. Miranda, S. Vega, Captain Weston Phillips, Lieutenant Eddie Bustos and D. Martin |
1:2018cv01671 |
December 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Jennifer L Thurston |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Lewis Anderson. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 5 MOTION to disregard / strike Plaintiff's #3 MOTION for EXTENSION OF TIME by Lewis Anderson. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 4 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Lewis Anderson. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 3 MOTION for EXTENSION OF TIME to File Consent; REQUEST for CLARIFICATION of TWO CASE NUMBERS, by Lewis Anderson. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: Plaintiff's Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Jessen, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Lewis Anderson. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Eddie Bustos, Ralph Diaz, John Katavich, A. Klang, R. Lara, D. Martin, R. Miranda, G. Munoz, Weston Phillips, S. Vega by Lewis Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.