Avila et al v. Alewine et al
| Miguel Avila and Yamilet Avila |
| Anthony Allen Alewine, United States Postal Service and United States of America |
| 1:2018cv01684 |
| December 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Lawrence J O'Neill |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2671 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE from 2/26/2019 to 3/28/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. The parties shall file a joint scheduling report 7 days prior to the scheduling conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/30/2019. (Hernandez, M)
|
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Continuance of Scheduling Conference by Miguel Avila. (Moeck, David) |
|
Filing 13
Order GRANTING #12 Petition for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/23/2019. (Rosales, O.)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to APPOINT GUARDIAN AD LITEM by Miguel Avila. (Moeck, David) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER Discharging Order to Show Cause and Requiring Plaintiff to File a Petition for Guardian Ad Litem by January 24, 2019, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/22/2019. (Jessen, A)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to ORDER to SHOW CAUSE by Miguel Avila. (Moeck, David) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER STRIKING #7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not issue for Failure to Comply with Court Order,signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/17/19. Show Cause Response due : 5-Day Deadline. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *United States of America* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *David M. Moeck* *Quinlan, Kershaw & Fanucchi, LLP* *2125 Merced Street* *Fresno, CA 93721*. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against United States of America by Miguel Avila.(Moeck, David) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF YAMILET AVILA TO FILE A PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM. Accordingly, Plaintiff Yamilet Avila is HEREBY ORDERED to file her petition for appointment of a guardian ad litem on or before January 15, 2019. Plaintiff is directed to Rule 202 of the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California which addresses the requirements for the petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/11/2019. (Hernandez, M)
|
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint against All Defendants by Miguel Avila.(Moeck, David) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Anthony Allen Alewine, United States Postal Service* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *David M. Moeck* *Quinlan, Kershaw & Fanucchi, LLP* *2125 Merced Street* *Fresno, CA 93721*. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/26/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE to Attorney David Moeck: Please re-file your Petition for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem as a Motion to Appoint Guardian ad Litem, which can be found under the category, Motions and Related Filings, Motions. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Miguel Avila. Attorney Moeck, David M added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8011196) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice)(Moeck, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
