(HC) Williams v. Diaz
| Kai Walter Williams |
| Ralph Diaz |
| 1:2018cv01728 |
| December 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Lawrence J O'Neill |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Assign District Judge - CASE ASSIGNED to Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill and Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. New Case No. 1:18-cv-01728 LJO SKO (HC) #1 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/30/2019: 30-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), served on Kai Walter Williams. (Hellings, J) |
| Filing 6 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Marrujo, C) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Kai Williams signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/21/18. (Marrujo, C)
|
| Filing 4 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Central; Case Number 2:18-cv-10345. |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #5 Order Authorizing IFP Status, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, served on Kai Walter Williams. (Marrujo, C) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian transferring case to EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Original file, certified copy of the transfer order and docket sheet sent. (See document for details.) (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (sbou) [Transferred from cacd on 12/21/2018.]
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV 111) (esa) [Transferred from cacd on 12/21/2018.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian, (Filing fee Due), filed by petitioner Kai W. Williams. (esa) [Transferred from cacd on 12/21/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Williams v. Diaz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Ralph Diaz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kai Walter Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
