CIBC Bank USA v. ISI Security Group, Inc. et al
CIBC Bank USA |
ISI Detention Contracting Group, Inc., Metroplex Commercial Fire and Security Alarms, Inc., ISI Detention Systems, Inc., ISI Security Group, Inc., ISI Systems, Ltd., Com-Tec Security, LLC, Argyle Security, Inc., Com-Tec California Limited Partnership, ISI Controls, Ltd., Metroplex Control Systems, Inc., Detention Contracting Group, Ltd. and MCFSA, Ltd. |
Scott E. Eisenberg of Amherst Consulting, LLC |
1:2018mc00032 |
June 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Stanley A Boone |
Other Statutory Actions |
Civil Miscellaneous Case |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 NOTICE of Receivership Pursuant to 28 USC 754 by Scott E. Eisenberg of Amherst Consulting LLC. Attorney Pollack, Joshua Judah added. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint for Appointment of Receiver, Part 1 of 3, #2 Exhibit A-2 Complaint for Appointment of Receiver, Part 2 of 3, #3 Exhibit A-3 Complaint for Appointment of Receiver, Part 3 of 3, #4 Exhibit B- Agreed Order Appointing Receiver, #5 Exhibit C- Order Granting Receiver's Unopposed Motion to Reappoint Receiver)(Pollack, Joshua) |
NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED: Receivership. (Jessen, A) |
PAYMENT for miscellaneous case filing fee in the amount of $ 47, receipt number 0972-7741772. (Pollack, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.