(HC) Johnson v. Kernan, et al.
| Derrick Johnson |
| Scott Kernan, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Daniel Buckley |
| 1:2019cv00032 |
| January 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Anthony W Ishii |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER of USCA as to #4 Notice of Appeal filed by Derrick Johnson. This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Jessen, A)
|
| Filing 11 EX PARTE APPLICATION by Derrick Johnson for Good Cause of Applicant and Plaintiff Derrick L. Johnson. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 10 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the Court Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus since it does not allege grounds that would entitle Petitioner to Habeas Corpus relief and Decline to Issue a Certificate of Appealability re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ; referred to Judge Ishii,signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/5/19. Objections to F&R due 30-Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to District Judge Anthony W. Ishii and Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The new case number is: 1:19-cv-00032 AWI-SKO (HC). (Martin-Gill, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), served on Derrick Johnson. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), served on Derrick Johnson. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 9 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, served on Derrick Johnson. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), 9 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, served on Derrick Johnson. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 8 Ex Parte application for good cause, and motion to be determined on the brief of movant by Derrick Johnson. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 7 Ex Parte Application for good cause and motion to be determined on the brief by Derrick Johnson. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 6 USCA CASE NUMBER 19-15171 for #4 Notice of Appeal filed by Derrick Johnson. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 5 APPEAL PROCESSED to Ninth Circuit re #4 Notice of Appeal filed by Derrick Johnson. Notice of Appeal filed *1/24/2019*, Complaint filed *1/8/2019* and Appealed Order / Judgment filed *1/8/2019*. ** *Fee Status: IFP Granted on 1/9/2019* (Attachments: #1 Appeal Information) (Martin-Gill, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Appeal Processed to USCA, served on Derrick Johnson. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEAL by Derrick Johnson. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 2/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Lundstrom, T) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Derrick Johnson signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/9/2019. (Lundstrom, T)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Order Authorizing IFP Status, #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Derrick Johnson. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Daniel Buckley, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Scott Kernan by Derrick Johnson.(Lundstrom, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
