Boling Air Media Inc. v. Panalpina Inc. et al
| Boling Air Media Inc. |
| EVA Airways Corporation and Panalpina Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00084 |
| January 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Boling Air Media Inc.. (Stoker, Steven) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Panalpina Inc.. (Raia, Marilyn) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER by Panalpina Inc..(Raia, Marilyn) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER by EVA Airways Corporation.(Sutherland, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/28/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Gonzalez, R) |
| RECEIPT number 0972-8067289 for $400.00 paid by Kevin Richard Sutherland on 1/17/2018 fbo EVA Airways Corporation. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by EVA Airways Corporation. (Sutherland, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Fresno County Superior Court, case number 18CECG04534 by EVA Airways Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sutherland, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
