Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al.
| Michael Adams |
| C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00085 |
| January 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-71). CASE TRANSFERRED to the District of Arizona. MDL No. 2641. (Robles, S) |
| OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from DISTRICT OF ARIZONA case number 2:19-cv-00927. (Robles, S) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/18/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael J. Williams* *Cellino & Barnes, P.C.* *2500 Main Place Tower 350 Main Street* *Buffalo, NY 14202-3725*. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC., C.R. Bard, Inc., Doe Defendants 1-10 by Michael Adams. Attorney Williams, Michael J. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8067443) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Williams, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
