(HC) Merth v. Puentes
Randall Merth |
G. Puentes |
1:2019cv00251 |
February 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Stanley A Boone |
Lawrence J O'Neill |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER DENYING #10 Petitioner's Request to Amend Briefing Schedule, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 04/17/19. (Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #11 Order served on Randall Merth. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 10 Titled "Objection to Initial Findings of Magistrate" by Randall Merth (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill and Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. The new case number is: 1:19-cv-00251 LJO-SAB (HC). (Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 9 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, served on Randall Merth. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 8 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Randall Merth. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 7 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT FOR RESPONDENT, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 03/25/2019. Consent or Decline due by 4/29/2019 (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 03/25/2019. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. Consent or Decline due by 5/28/2019 (Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition, served on Randall Merth. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL Information in Evidence and Exhibits by Randall Merth. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 4 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Randall Merth re #2 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/22/2019. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: Petitioner's Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Jessen, A) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Randall Merth. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 1 (2241) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against G. Puentes by Randall Merth. (Jessen, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #4 Order Authorizing IFP Status served on Randall Merth. (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (HC) Merth v. Puentes | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: G. Puentes | |
Represented By: | Dale Patrick |
Represented By: | Bureau of Prisons Regional Counsel |
Represented By: | US Attorney's Office- 2241 Unit |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Randall Merth | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.