(PC) Harris, Jr. v. Randle et al
| Devon Dante Harris, Jr. |
| Jaislyn Randle, James Randle, Bakersfield Indigent Defense Program, Lavonda Randle, Kern District Attorney Office and Anthony Gordon |
| 1:2019cv00254 |
| February 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Devon Dante Harris, Jr. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Devon Dante Harris, Jr. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis OR Pay Filing Fee Within 45 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 2/26/19. (Attachments: #1 IFP App & Instructions.Prisoner) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order, served on Devon Dante Harris, Jr.. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 4/1/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint served on Devon Dante Harris, Jr.. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 1
(1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Devon Dante Harris, Jr..(Marrujo, C)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
