(PC) Michael Hewitt v. Board of Parole Hearings et al
Plaintiff: Michael Hewitt
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Board of Parole Hearings
Case Number: 1:2019cv00501
Filed: April 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley A Boone
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION for 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to File First Amended Complaint by Michael Hewitt. (Gonzalez, R)
June 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting in part #7 Motion for Extension of Time to file an amended complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/5/2019. Amended Complaint due within 30-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
June 5, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order on Motion for Extension of Time served on Michael Hewitt. (Lundstrom, T)
June 3, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for 60-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to file First Amended Complaint by Michael Hewitt. (Lundstrom, T)
May 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCREENING ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Leave to File an Amended Complaint,signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/1/19. (Amended Complaint due 30-Day Deadline) (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint Form)(Martin-Gill, S)
May 1, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order, served on Michael Hewitt. (Martin-Gill, S)
April 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP APPLICATION) (Martin-Gill, S)
April 22, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Michael Hewitt. (Martin-Gill, S)
April 19, 2019 Filing 4 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: New Case Documents served on CCI-Tehachapi. (Martin-Gill, S)
April 19, 2019 Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *4/17/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 5/23/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Martin-Gill, S)
April 17, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Michael Hewitt. (Martin-Gill, S)
April 17, 2019 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Board of Parole Hearings, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation by Michael Hewitt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin-Gill, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Michael Hewitt v. Board of Parole Hearings et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Board of Parole Hearings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Hewitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?