(PC) Hunt v. Diaz et al
1:2019cv00504 |
April 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 ORDER ADOPTING 70 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING Action Due to Plaintiff's Failure to Prosecute, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/6/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 70 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of Action, Without Prejudice, for Failure to Prosecute re 69 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/02/2021. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen-Days. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 69 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/27/2021. Show Cause Response due within 15-Days. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 66 ORDER DISCHARGING 64 Order to Show Cause signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/28/2021. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 64 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not be Imposed on Defendants for Failure to File a Status Report signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/27/2021. Show Cause Response due within ten (10) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 61 ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 52 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution of Plaintiff's Criminal Case and Disciplinary Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/29/2020. CASE STAYED (90-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 60 ORDER DENYING 53 Motion for TRO; ORDER ADOPTING 56 Findings and Recommendations; ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to correct the docket entry for Document No. 58 by modifying the title to state: Objections to 52 Motion to Stay, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/26/2020. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 59 ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFFS SECOND 57 REPLY TO DEFENDANTS ANSWER, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/22/2020. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 56 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 53 Plaintiff's Request for Temporary Restraining Order be DENIED re 20 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/17/2020. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 50 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS regarding Plaintiff's Notice of lost and destroyed documents 47 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/12/2020. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd; Objections to F&R due within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 48 ORDER LIFTING Stay of Proceedings, and DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Issue the Discovery and Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/11/2020. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 44 ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 43 Request to Allow Plaintiff to Appear by Telephone at the Settlement Conference, if necessary, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/18/2020. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 39 ORDER Setting Settlement Conference by Video signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/27/2020. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 37 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for reconsideration 26 signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/3/2020. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 36 ORDER STRIKING 35 Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Answer signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/26/2020. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 32 ORDER REFERRING Case to Post-Screening ADR and Staying Case for 120 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/9/2020. Settlement Conference set for 6/25/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 31 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 29 Motion for Appointment of Counsel of Guardian Ad Litem, Without Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/3/2020. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING 21 Findings and Recommendations; This action shall proceed solely on plaintiffs excessive use of force claim against defendants D. Diaz, A. Velasquez, J. Brainard, G. Solorio, and K. Reyes; Matter referred back to Magistrate Judge, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/5/19. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 21 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending this 20 Action Proceed only on Plaintiff's Excessive Force Claim signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/18/2019. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. Objections to F&R due within Twenty-One (21) Days. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 18 ORDER VACATING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Plaintiff is advised that the complaint will be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A in due course, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/27/2019. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 14 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the instant action be dismissed for failure to prosecute ; referred to Judge Drozd; New case number is 1:19-cv-00504 SAB (PC), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/27/2019. Objections to F&R due 14-Day Deadline(Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 11 ORDER for Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/3/19. Show Cause Response Due Within Fourteen Days. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 7 ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:19-cv-0543 DMC) to Fresno (1:19-cv-0504 SAB) signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 4/19/2019. (Henshaw, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (PC) Hunt v. Diaz et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.