AfterGlow, LLC v. Bright Path Lighting, Inc.
Plaintiff: AfterGlow, LLC
Defendant: Bright Path Lighting, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv00535
Filed: April 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Anthony W Ishii
Referring Judge: Barbara A McAuliffe
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 PRO HAC VICE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/27/19. Added attorney Eric P. Lee, PHV for Bright Path Lighting, Inc., (Martin-Gill, S)
June 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 PRO HAC VICE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/27/19. Added attorney Christopher B. Hadley, PHV for Bright Path Lighting, Inc., (Martin-Gill, S)
June 26, 2019 Filing 13 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Bright Path Lighting, Inc. for attorney Eric P. Lee to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-8331672) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Utah)(Miller, Mark)
June 26, 2019 Filing 12 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Bright Path Lighting, Inc. for attorney Christopher B. Hadley to appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Miller, Mark D. added. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-8331621) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Utah, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Massachusetts)(Miller, Mark)
May 17, 2019 Filing 11 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Bright Path Lighting, Inc. on 5/7/2019, Answer due 7/8/2019 (Matthews, Richard)
May 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PRO HAC VICE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/16/19. Added attorney Richard T. Matthews, PHV for AfterGlow, LLC. (Gonzalez, R)
May 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PRO HAC VICE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/16/19. Added attorney Andrew R. Shores, PHV for AfterGlow, LLC. (Gonzalez, R)
May 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PRO HAC VICE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/16/19. Added attorney Robert C. Van Arnam, PHV for AfterGlow, LLC. (Gonzalez, R)
May 13, 2019 Filing 7 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by AfterGlow, LLC for attorney Robert C. Van Arnam to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-8258795) (Wanger, Oliver)
May 13, 2019 Filing 6 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by AfterGlow, LLC for attorney Andrew R. Shores to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-8258792) (Wanger, Oliver)
May 13, 2019 Filing 5 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by AfterGlow, LLC for attorney Richard T. Matthews to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-8258779) (Wanger, Oliver)
May 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT Only) Parties wishing to appear telephonically at the SCHEDULING CONFERENCE currently set for Tuesday, July 30, 2019 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe may do so with each party using the following dial-in number and passcode: dial-in number 1-877-411-9748; passcode 3190866. Minute order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/3/2019. (Valdez, E)
April 25, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Bright Path Lighting, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Oliver W. Wanger* *Wanger Jones Helsley PC* *265 E. River Park Circle, Suite 310* *Fresno, CA 93720*. (Hellings, J)
April 25, 2019 Filing 2 PATENT NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED as to Patent #1:* 8,479,423 * * 7/9/2013 * * Martin et al. * Patent #2:* 8,286,378 B2 * * 10/16/2012 * * Martin et al. * ; copy of Complaint and Patent Report emailed to U.S. Office of Patents and Trademarks. Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/30/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Patent Report, #3 VDRP) (Hellings, J)
April 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Infringement of U.S. Patents against Bright Path Lighting, Inc. by AfterGlow, LLC. Attorney Wanger, Oliver W. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8226525) Receipt paid on the 1:19-AT-296 case, but applied to this case 1:19-AT-297 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Exhibit Summons)(Wanger, Oliver) Modified on 4/25/2019 (Nelson, J). Modified on 4/25/2019 (Woodson, A).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AfterGlow, LLC v. Bright Path Lighting, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bright Path Lighting, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher B. Hadley, PHV
Represented By: Mark D. Miller
Represented By: Eric P. Lee, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AfterGlow, LLC
Represented By: Christopher Adam Lisieski
Represented By: Oliver W. Wanger
Represented By: Richard T. Matthews, PHV
Represented By: Andrew R. Shores, PHV
Represented By: Robert C. Van Arnam, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?