Chavira v. U.S. Department of Education et al
Maria Chavira |
Immediate Credit Recovery, Inc. and U.S. Department of Education |
1:2019cv00538 |
April 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Stanley A Boone |
Dale A Drozd |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 2201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 STIPULATION Stipulation to Change Date for Mandatory Scheduling Conference and Order Thereon by Maria Chavira. (Krbechek, Randolf) |
Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) The Court moves the Scheduling Conference from 7/16/2019 to 7/19/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/1/2019. (Hernandez, M) |
Filing 16 ORDER DISCHARGING #11 Order to Show Cause signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/27/2019. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 15 ANSWER by U.S. Department of Education. Attorney Lodge, Jeffrey James added.(Lodge, Jeffrey) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE to ORDER to SHOW CAUSE by Maria Chavira. (Krbechek, Randolf) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: U.S. Department of Education served on 4/30/2019, answer due 5/21/2019. (Krbechek, Randolf) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Immediate Credit Recovery, Inc. served on 5/1/2019, answer due 5/22/2019. (Krbechek, Randolf) |
Filing 11 ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Issue for the Failure to Comply with the April 26, 2019 Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference; Show Cause Response within Ten Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/24/2019. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 10 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Immediate Credit Recovery, Inc.. (Kaminski, David) |
Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Immediate Credit Recovery, Inc.. (Kaminski, David) |
Filing 8 ANSWER by Immediate Credit Recovery, Inc..(Kaminski, David) |
Filing 7 ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiffs complaint on or before June 12, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/22/2019. (Hernandez, M) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint to 6-12-19 by Immediate Credit Recovery, Inc.. Attorney Kaminski, David Jay added. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kaminski, David) |
Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/16/2019 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Immediate Credit Recovery, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Randolf Krbechek* *Law Offices of Randolf Krbechek* *9477 N. Fort Washington Road, Suite 104* *Fresno, CA 93730*. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *U.S. Department of Education* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Randolf Krbechek* *Law Offices of Randolf Krbechek* *9477 N. Fort Washington Road, Suite 104* *Fresno, CA 93730*. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Maria Chavira (Krbechek, Randolf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief and Violation of Fair Debt Collection Practices Act against All Defendants by Maria Chavira. Attorney Krbechek, Randolf added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8228995) (Krbechek, Randolf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.