Hall et al v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company (LLC)
Plaintiff: Carlos Cantu and Patrick Hall
Defendant: Kraft Heinz Foods Company (LLC) and Matt Nino
Case Number: 1:2019cv00565
Filed: May 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Barbara A McAuliffe
Referring Judge: Lawrence J O'Neill
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM, DECISION and ORDER denying Plaintiff's #9 Motion to Remand and granting Defendant's #6 Motion to Dismiss signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/24/2019. (Lundstrom, T)
June 11, 2019 Filing 12 REPLY by Carlos Cantu, Patrick Hall to RESPONSE to #6 MOTION to DISMISS, #9 MOTION to REMAND TO CALIFORNIA STATE COURT. (Sweeney, Brandon)
June 4, 2019 Filing 11 OPPOSITION by Kraft Heinz Foods Company (LLC) to #9 MOTION to REMAND TO CALIFORNIA STATE COURT. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Emma Bittner in Support of Defendant Kraft Food Company, LLC's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand)(Lowe, Shanda)
May 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) It appears that Plaintiffs have filed their opposition to the pending motion to dismiss #6 as part of a motion to remand #9 . Pursuant to Local Rule 230(e), the Court sets the following deadlines for briefing on both motions. Defendant may file a combined reply re his motion to dismiss and opposition to the motion to remand on or before June 4, 2019. This combined brief may not exceed 15 pages in length. On or before June 11, 2019, Plaintiffs may file a reply re their motion to remand ONLY. Thereafter, the Court will inform the parties if it believes a hearing would be helpful or necessary. Otherwise, it will take the matter under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on May 28, 2019. (Munoz, I)
May 27, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to REMAND TO CALIFORNIA STATE COURT by Carlos Cantu, Patrick Hall. Motion Hearing set for 6/10/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Sweeney, Brandon)
May 27, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ORDER SETTING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Carlos Cantu, Patrick Hall. (Sweeney, Brandon)
May 27, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Brandon Jeris Sweeney on behalf of Carlos Cantu, Patrick Hall. (Sweeney, Brandon)
May 8, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION to DISMISS by Matt Nino. Attorney Lowe, Shanda Y. added. Motion Hearing set for 6/10/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Proposed Order granting Motion to Dismiss, #3 Proof of Service)(Lowe, Shanda)
May 8, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Compliance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1446(d) by Kraft Heinz Foods Company (LLC) re #1 Notice of Removal,. (Lowe, Shanda)
May 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT Only) Parties wishing to appear telephonically at the SCHEDULING CONFERENCE currently set for Wednesday, July 31, 2019 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe may do so with each party using the following dial-in number and passcode: dial-in number 1-877-411-9748; passcode 3190866. Minute order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/3/2019. (Valdez, E)
May 2, 2019 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/31/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S)
May 1, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Kraft Heinz Foods Company (LLC) (Lowe, Shanda)
May 1, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Tulare County Superior Court, case number 277922 by Carlos Cantu, Patrick Hall. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8240960) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel Chammas, #2 Notice (Certificate of Interested Parties), #3 Proof of Service)(Lowe, Shanda)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hall et al v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company (LLC)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Cantu
Represented By: Brandon Jeris Sweeney
Represented By: Jonathan Junse Moon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Hall
Represented By: Brandon Jeris Sweeney
Represented By: Jonathan Junse Moon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kraft Heinz Foods Company (LLC)
Represented By: Daniel Benjamin Chammas
Represented By: Shanda Y. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matt Nino
Represented By: Shanda Y. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?