Goods v. City of Bakersfield Police Department et al
Charles Francis Goods |
Sgt. Woods and City of Bakersfield Police Department |
1:2019cv00662 |
May 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Anthony W Ishii |
Jennifer L Thurston |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER to the PLAINTIFF to File a Second Amended Complaint, to Notify the Court He Wishes to Proceed Only on the Cognizable Claim or to Dismiss the Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/3/2019. (Hall, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order served on Charles Francis Goods. (Hall, S) |
Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Charles Francis Goods.(Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to P.O. Box 3535 Norco, CA 92860 by Charles Francis Goods. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING #2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/23/2019. (Hall, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on Charles Francis Goods. (Hall, S) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Charles Francis Goods. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Bakersfield Police Department, Woods by Charles Francis Goods. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.