Castro v. Paragon Industries, Inc.
| Elizabeth Castro |
| Paragon Industries, Inc. and Paragon Industries, Inc. a California Corporation Doing business as Bedrosians |
| 1:2019cv00755 |
| May 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRSTAMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPONDTO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/1/2019. (Kusamura, W)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension Of Time To Respond To First Amended Complaint by Paragon Industries, Inc.. (Kruthers, Mark) |
| Filing 3 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint by Paragon Industries, Inc.. (Kruthers, Mark) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/8/2019 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Fresno County Superior Court, case number 18CECG01707 by All Defendants. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8286210) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Corporate Disclosure)(Kruthers, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
