(HC) Foster v. Gastelo
Petitioner: Craig Lamar Foster
Respondent: Josie Gastelo
Case Number: 1:2019cv00860
Filed: June 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jennifer L Thurston
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2019 Filing 9 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Craig Lamar Foster. (Marrujo, C)
July 16, 2019 Filing 8 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on Tami Krenzin. (Marrujo, C)
July 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/16/19. Consent or Decline due by 8/19/2019. (Marrujo, C)
July 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING Respondent to File a Response; ORDER SETTING Briefing Schedule; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Serve Documents on Attorney General, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/15/19. (Marrujo, C)
July 16, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition served on Craig Lamar Foster. (Marrujo, C)
July 16, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order Re Consent or Request for Reassignment served on Craig Lamar Foster. (Marrujo, C)
July 10, 2019 MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Out to Court: #5 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel sent to Craig Lamar Foster. (Flores, E)
July 9, 2019 MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Out to Court,: #4 Order Authorizing IFP Status sent to Craig Lamar Foster. Notice of Change of Address due by 9/16/2019. (Flores, E)
June 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/26/19. (Martin-Gill, S)
June 27, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel served on Craig Lamar Foster. (Martin-Gill, S)
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Craig Lamar Foster, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/24/19. (Gonzalez, R)
June 24, 2019 Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Petitioner's Consent or Decline Due Within Thirty Days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Gonzalez, R)
June 24, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #4 Order Authorizing IFP Status served on Craig Lamar Foster. (Gonzalez, R)
June 21, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Craig Lamar Foster. (Gonzalez, R)
June 21, 2019 Filing 1 (2254) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Josie Gastelo by Craig Lamar Foster. (Gonzalez, R)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Foster v. Gastelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Josie Gastelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Craig Lamar Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?