Bateman et al v. United States of America
Jacqueline Bateman and Steve Bateman |
United States of America |
1:2019cv00869 |
June 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Stanley A Boone |
Dale A Drozd |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1346 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Lin, Suizi) |
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/10/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of NONCOMPLIANCE With Electronic Filing Requirement (Local Rule 135(g)): Attorney Stephen H Cornet is directed to register for CM/ECF. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *United States of America* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Suizi Ohn Mar Shwe Ma Lin* *1633 San Pablo Ave.* *Oakland, CA 94612*. (Sant Agata, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Civil New Case Documents for DAD, #2 Summons, 3 Notice of Noncompliance with Electronic Filing Requirement served on Stephen H Cornet. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America by Jacqueline Bateman, Steve Bateman. Attorney Lin, Suizi Ohn Mar Shwe Ma added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8327538) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lin, Suizi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.